1. There is a massive tree that looms over and above my first floor balcony. In the summer months it encases the whole balcony in lush greeness, pressing itself against the apartment building, branches reaching onto the balcony and whipping against windows on windier nights. It has grown above and beyond the height of the whole building in the 4 years we have lived here, and now it feels like the building itself is being hugged by this ambitious arbor. If it were cut down, it feels like the building would topple backwards. The tree, aside from providing shade, green-filtered light, privacy and the vision of nature hugging architecture which always pleases, has also provided us with a mini-ecosystem of fauna. The birds I have mentioned before, but the last few weeks have seen Panda and I glued to the windows or squished together on the tiny balcony every night, as a flock of fruit bats come to visit. We've seen up to 10 or 12 of them at a time, screeching and clicking at each other, fighting over the berries that cover every branch, and I can only assume, in the spirit of the Mardi Gras festival they have arrived in time for, having lots of fruity sex.
That is usually my favourite part. I love that up close, when their leathery wings are tucked around their bodies, you can see why they are compared to foxes, or in Panda's case, 'flying puppies'. There is something almost painfully familiar about them, and when they are caught in our torch light, close enough to touch, the desire to have one for a pet, to reach out and scritch the back of their fuzzy necks or stroke their velveteen ears is overwhelming. Though Panda and I are currently (sadly) petless, it is as if that intense maternal instinct for my lost fur-children returns; muscle memory commands me to hug the nearest mammal. And then they leap, extending a massive wing-span at odds with the tiny little bodies I had decided would fit perfectly into a makeshift bed in my sock drawer. The tree heaves with their leaving, and sometimes you can feel the wind created by the beat of their wings. And then they are completely alien, untouchable, wild. They wouldn't want to sleep in my sock drawer, or eat the fruit platter I would make for them and put in their row of little bowls in the kitchen, embossed with the names I had already begun doling out (Morris, Lady Jane, Bea Arthur, Captain Jack...). In the moment of flight they are beautifully distant, and I love their dual nature, their duplicity. They are hybrids and I have always loved hybridity. And, as Panda pointed out, laughing gently when I voiced my desire to keep them and hug them and love for ever and ever, 'You don't need to own everything. It's enough that they've visited.'
2. I made a stranger laugh.
3. I was reading a collection of essays by David Sedaris that mentioned that in New Jersey it is illegal to give a monkey a cigarette. This of course brings to mind a series of excellent and time-consuming legal questions: If it's illegal to give a monkey a cigarette, are you legally obliged to take the cigarette off a monkey who has obtained it legally? I assume it is completely legal if the monkey manages to procure its own cigarettes, as no-one wants to arrest a smoking monkey (turns out I am sorely mistaken in this point). Apart from the truly satisfying tangent this fact sent me on (how did the law come into effect? What was the case that pushed this into legislation?), it also led me to try and find out if this was actually true. And, whilst I could not at first glance find any supporting evidence for this law, I did learn that in New Jersey it is prohibited to give zoo animals cigars or whisky. Excellent.
It is in fact, illegal in South Bend, Indiana to make a monkey smoke a cigarette. The case that propelled this specific law into legislation occurred in 1924, when a monkey was found guilty of smoking and fined $25.
Like any good researcher, I am driven, not just to accept the facts as they are given, but to seek out their origins and ramifications, the context of their conception and their continued effects in the world. And now I have a whole host of new questions that beg answering: Why is it illegal in Zion, Illinois to give a lit cigar to a domesticated animal? Why cigars specifically? And why not, while we're at it, extend the law to protect wild animals from the dangers of mouth cancer at the same time? Also in Illinois, the town of Champaign has forbidden people from urinating in their neighbour's mouth. Why only your neighbour's mouth? Why don't forbid mouth urination in its entirety? Does this law take into consideration consent, or does it merely reflect the town council's abiding interest in stamping out piss-play where ever they find it?
Arkansas outlaws both oral sex and keeping alligators in bathtubs.

You will be fined up to $500 in Kentucky if you try to sell a duckling or baby rabbit that has been dyed or coloured. In Kansas City, if your taste in decor runs to bathtubs with clawed feet it's time to relocate, as bathtubs with feet resembling animal paws are prohibited. In Mole, Missouri it's illegal to frighten a baby. In Montana, it is illegal for unmarried women to fish without a chaperone. Professional boxers in Louisiana may be tough physically, clearly a well-timed insult will send them bawling back to their corners, as it is illegal for spectators to mock them. In Florida, if you're a male wearing a strapless gown and you leave your elephant parked at a meter without paying as you would for a vehicle, expect some jail time. Legislation exists all over the place to outlaw such dangerous and offensive behaviour as gargling, shaving and humming in public.
It is always a good thing to expand your knowledge. Especially bite-sized bits of knowledge, which I intend to use instead of greetings from now on. Each email, text message, and letter I write, will now begin with the citation of one of these laws, skipping straight over the boring and often disingenuous 'Dear Blah, How are you?'
4. Yep, that really was a fabulous coffee.
5. When I'm suffering paralyzing writer's block but don't want to leave my desk because then I feel like I'm letting it win, I valiantly stay at the computer to try and fool the writer's block into thinking I'm still working (bad news, by the way, when you start to treat something that is inside your brain as an external force with a consciousness). So I do things that can be considered, at glance, as work. Like electronic filing, moving documents to other areas, creating new folders and labelling them with a complex coded system of organization which I will of course forget immediately. I also spend time painstakingly moving things to my external hard drive, and whilst engaging in this rather pointless busy-work, I found this very old photo of Morgan, my beloved ginger tom, who died 5 or 6 years ago now.

All of this rushed back in a condensed little ball of emotion and memory, and in the face of an otherwise pretty empty and frustrating day, it wasn't such a bad thing.
Your listblog reminds me of top 5 emails between bookshop and metroscreen back in the day. And such fine emails they were; little pockets of trivia and amusement, accidental emotion and fun-new-facts shared by friends.
ReplyDeleteI find it wonderfully apt that your 'thoughts and feelings' blog has a rigorous system of rules: so very, very you. And while I respect your decision to set the boundaries for your project, I propose that it may not be such a bad thing if you seek out "good things" as well as discover them reflectively. At the risk of sounding like a wanker, the benefits of your project could develop organically.
I love that tree. And I still feel most self-satisfied that I've climbed it. Even if I had to climb it cos I'd locked you out...
xxx
also. amusing typo:
ReplyDelete"...I would make for them and put in their row of little bowels in the kitchen..."
aw vivi. I fucking love, and miss, You. Glad to have some blog viv though, cures what ails me a little.
ReplyDelete@maeve. Every expression of 'thoughts and feeling' is based, to some extent, on a rigorous system of rules or guidelines. I only make them explicit in order to emphasize the traditionally invisible structures of narrative that both condition and constitute our speech acts.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I went back and edited the spelling error so now you look like a crazy person. With love, Hainsworth. xx
@Sara. I also love and miss you! But I adore your blog, especially the photos. It is like you popped out your eyeballs and shoved them in my sockets, just for a moment. That is quite gross... I mean they remind me very strongly of the way you view the world.
ReplyDeleteAlso, you are a nanny?! Fabulous! Your job has a theme song! xx